In the News

  

The Newspaper.com reports on Georgia Supreme Court Intoxilyzer Source Code Ruling

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Intox 5000 Georgia Source CodeTheNewspaper.com reported on February 18, 2015 about the Georgia Supreme Court's ruling in Parker v. State reversing the Georgia Court of Appeals who had affirmed the Trial Court's decision to exclude proffered evidence of accuracy problems that an out of state witness from the Intoxilyzer 5000 (Intox 5000) manufacturer, CMI, Inc., might be expected to testify about as a material witness to the case. 

CMI, Inc. has been engaged in a multi-state battle to prevent DUI defendants from obtaining their claimed super-secret computer source code. Analyzing the computer source code of these breath testing machines is the only way to know how they actually generate their alcohol breath results as so many variables have to be assumed and are not in fact measured.

The trial court had held that such accuracy evidence was hearsay and without live testimony from witnesses about the accuracy problems of the Intox 5000, the defendant could not establish the materiality component of out of state witness subpoena issuance inquiry.  The logical dilemma posed by the trial court's ruling was the only people with personal knowledge of the internal workings of the machine that could testify in Georgia that such issues were material to issue a subpoena were in fact the witnesses sought by the out of state subpoenas at issue in the appeal.  So what comes first, the chicken or the egg? Luckily, Justice Nahmias found that the proffered evidence could be hearsay as it was a preliminary determination under the Evidence Code which is an exception to the hearsay rules in Georgia under the new evidence code.  

Parker submitted evidence regarding the widespread accuracy problems with the Intoxilyzer. Washington, DC had to overturn 300 DUI convictions as a result of the use of faulty machines over the course of a decade. Virginia officials spent $1.8 million to replace Intoxilyzer 5000 units deemed "dated, unstable and unreliable."  This evidence is admissible and will have to be weighed by the Trial Court to determine if it meets the Materiality requirement of Georgia's Out of State Witness Subpoena statute. 

-Author: George Creal



Tags

 

Archive



 

is a trial lawyer with 18 years of courtroom experience. He is one of only 6 Atlanta DUI lawyers with both an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale.com and a 10.0/10.0 Superb rating on Avvo.com. He has over 100 "not guilty" verdicts under his belt and has forged indispensable relationships with police, judges and prosecutors all over the State of Georgia in order to benefit his clients' defense.
George Creal Attorney Profile+

The National Trial Lawyers


READ SUCCESS STORIES ON FACEBOOK FAN PAGE BELOW

 
George C. Creal Jr., P.C., Top Atlanta DUI Law Firm

No legal advice should be obtained from the web site alone. George C. Creal, Jr., P.C. is Georgia Professional Corporation authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia only and all information contained in this web site is intended for use for DUI/DWIs occurring in the State of Georgia. Individuals with DUI/DWIs from outside the State of Georgia should contact a licensed attorney in the state of occurrence of their DUI. Copyright © 2015 George C. Creal, Jr. P.C.
Protected by Copyscape Online Plagiarism Checker
George C. Creal Jr.
on Google+






Atlanta Office: 480 John Wesley Dobbs Ave., NE, Unit 190, Atlanta, GA 30312 Phone: (404) 333-0706