|
"They never read me my rights:" The Miranda Misunderstanding |
|
Friday, 31 August 2007 |
|
I recently spoke with a gentleman in a Metro Altanta DUI Court who
was woefully misinformed. As he complained that our country was
going to Hades in a Handbasket, he suggested that we replace the
Constitution that has served this Country for over 200 years with his
Common Sense rule. Everybody still gets a trial he told me, due
process you know, but nobody gets there case thrown out because of
Miranda. I thought to ask him if he understood Miranda, but soon
realized that this would be on par with flogging a dead equine.
In reality no one's "case" gets thrown out because they weren't read
Miranda rights. Miranda rights serve to exclude statements made
to police in response to police questioning after arrest for those who
have not been read their Miranda Rights, i.e., you have the right to
remain silent, if you talk or answer questions it will be used against
you at trial, you have a right to an attorney. That's it.
Spontaneous statements are not included in the Miranda Rule. No
one's case gets thrown out because they weren't read Miranda unless
their is no case in the first place. Typically, the police have
to have reasonably competent evidence of a crime or probable cause
before they arrest you anyway. Finally, don't confuse Miranda
rights with DUI rights or Georgia Implied Consent. With the
Georgia DUI Implied Consent rights, Miranda does not apply. You
can not remain silent. You have to answer their questions about
taking the state administered chemical test in Georgia. If you
remain silent, Georgia DUI Appellate Courts deem that a refusal and you
can lose your license for a minimum of one year. There is a DUI
exception to the Constitution in Georgia Courts in almost every
regard.
|