George C. Creal, Jr., P.C. DUI Trial Lawyers Email Consultation:
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
, or Phone Consultation: (770) 961 5511, or Submit an free online DUI case analysis using the "Contact" tab above. | |
Atlanta DUI Lawyers George C. Creal, Jr., P.C. is a law firm representing those charged with DUI or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Our firm has advised thousands of DUI clients primarily in Metro Atlanta: including the City of Atlanta, Fulton, DeKalb, Cobb, Cherokee, Forsyth, Henry, Clayton, Fayette, Rockdale, Spalding and Coweta Counties. We know the Court system, the Judges, the Prosecutors and how they work. I was a staff attorney for a Superior Court Judge in Clayton County in 1993-1994. DUI Georgia: Tough New Laws The toughest DUI laws in Georgia history went into effect on July 1, 2009. These laws require jail time for all DUI convictions, increased look back for mandatory sentencing from five years to 10 years, felony treatment for a fourth DUI in ten years, license suspensions, twelve months of reporting probation, and extensive community service. Some Georgia DUI offenders will have all of their license plates confiscated and be required to perform 30 days or 240 hours of community service!
In your Georgia DUI, you will face two courts: a criminal court and a driver's license court. Further, if you do not request a hearing with in ten business days, your license will be suspended thirty days after your arrest for as much as five years in some cases, usually before you even go to court for your DUI. DUI Georgia: New Laws Make Legal Representation EssentialGeorgia's Tough New DUI penalties make legal representation essential. If you do not contact us, please contact another attorney. Do not go to court unrepresented. If you can't afford to miss work for a year, you can't afford not to hire an experienced Atlanta DUI attorney. Hire Experienced Metro Area Atlanta DUI Attorneys | DUI GeorgiaWe take all major credit cards and have payment plans for qualified applicants. We are an established law firm here to help you. We will not plead your case guilty unless you tell us you do not want a trial. Call us at (770) 961-5511 for a free consultation, email
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
or fax us a copy of your tickets or police report at (770) 961-5544. Closing Argument Quotables "I consider [trial by jury] as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." --Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Paine, 1789. ME 7:408, Papers 15:269 "A lawyer without history or literature is a mechanic, a mere working mason; if he possesses some knowledge of these, he may venture to call himself an architect." -Sir Walter Scott
Most Commonly Asked Question: What do I do if I am arrested for DUI? The short answer is - it depends. Factors to consider are: jurisdiction of arrest, law enforcement agency of arrest, number of drinks. Generalizations are a dangerous thing and there are exceptions.
The basic rule of thumb in a DUI case is that a DUI with a "state administered" breath or blood test is harder to win at trial than a case without a test. This is true simply because the "Legal Limit" is amorphous, constantly changing number. In the 1980's, it was 0.12. In the 1990's, it was 0.10. Since 1997, it has been 0.08. Drinking and Driving did not get more dangerous. Rather, the DUI lobby got more powerful, the limit was tied to federal highway funds, and DUI bills are cheap political capital especially for "conservatives." So much for "State's Rights." No one sees them self as a potential DUI driver and certainly not the typical voter. What is "DUI - less safe" is generally well above 0.08 and maybe as high 0.15. I have had clients that could stand on one foot for more than 30 seconds well above .15 and they were clearly not "less safe" (or incapable of driving safely - the legal equivalent of "less safe") to drive. Some good ideas are: 1) Don't take the eye test commonly referred to as the HGN test. It rarely helps you. 2) Speak in short, concise sentences, be clear, and speak only when absolutely necessary. Remember you are probably being both filmed and recorded during the entire process. No rambling diatribes or life stories. If you have alcohol on your breath you are probably going to jail regardless. Start preparing for trial from the beginning. The police are simply getting ready for trial. 3) If you can avoid it don't refuse the one leg stand and walk and turn. It rarely looks innocent to refuse everything. Make the police look unreasonable. Try not to look unreasonable. However, only do the fields evaluations if you have good balance generally, are athletic, and are not noticeably unbalanced from alcohol. If you are really drunk, don't try the tests. You can not pass field evaluations. Field evaluations are measured in degrees of failure. 4) You can take the small hand held breath test offered before arrest. It is not admissible as a numerical result only positive or negative for alcohol. You have probably admitted drinking anyway. Many police will let you go if you blow under 0.08 legal limt on the handheld, pre-arrest breath test. 5) Ask lot of questions: Why do you want me to take field evaluations if I promise not to drive anymore, you must have a reasonable doubt? What happens if I below under the legal limit? Will you let me go? Am I going to jail? Can I speak with a lawyer? What happens if I refuse the test? Can I have an additional blood test and breath test from my own doctor? 6) Don't blow into the post arrest, cash register sized breath machine or give blood at the hospital, jail, police station or DUI Recreational Vehicle if you want to win your DUI at trial. However, you may lose your license for a year if you refuse. It is not automatic if you request a hearing within ten days of your arrest. If this is your 2nd DUI in ten years or you are under 21 years of age, or the officer is accusing you of driving under legal or illegal drugs always refuse. 7) Don't tell the police about all the prescription medication your are taking. Prescription pills can equal a DUI. It is no defense that you are following doctors orders. 8) Call a DUI lawyer immediately. Beware of attorney's quoting low fees. Low fees mean pleas. Attorneys charge by the hour. Less money equals less time. We handle a large volume of DUIs and take advantage of economies of scale to offer top quality legal representation at a reasonable price. We think justice should be affordable and offer payment plans to those without access to capital but with a job and established credit. Georgia DUI Myths: Myth: Driving at 0.08 is dangerous or a driver is impaired. Fact: A University of Utah study found that drivers talking on cell phones with and without earbuds were more dangerous than drivers who had consumed enough alcohol to be in excess of the 0.08 legal blood alcohol limit for most states. See blog link Strayer, D. Human Factors, Summer 2006; vol 48: pp 381-391. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety: “DUI/DWI Laws.” News release, University of Utah. Myth: Mouthwash or breath spray will help you beat a DUI. Fact: Mouthwash or breath spray is the worst thing you can do when faced with a DUI. Both mouthwash and breath spray will artificially inflate alcohol breath tests. Myth: Sucking on pennies will fool a dui breath machine. Fact: Pennies have no effect on alcohol breath test results. Myth: “Alcohol on the breath” is a reliable sign of alcohol consumption and intoxication. Fact: Alcohol is odorless. The smell of alcoholic beverages is not alcohol on the breath but is actually the odor of the things in or ingredients of the alcoholic beverages. Non-alcoholic beer like Odouls will produce the same smell the as drinking a regular beer. Georgia law even recognizes that a mere odor of alcohol is not enough to convict someone of DUI. Myth: A Breath test will clear diabetics who exhibit characteristics of alcohol impairment like slurred speech, confusion, stumbling, sleepiness, uncoordinated behavior and red face cause them to fail field sobriety tests. Fact: Diabetics frequently have acetone in their breath, which Breath Test Machines can confuse with alcohol in the blood stream. Myth: Field sobriety evaluations are validated by the National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration, and accurately identify drunk drivers. Fact: The three standardized test the HGN(eye jerking test), Walk and Turn and One Leg Stand are 77%, 65% AND 68% when performed under ideal conditions with those under 65 years of age, with no back, leg, knee, ankle or inner ear conditions on a flat, level, dry, debris free surface in heels less than two inches. On the side of a highway at night with strobe lights flashing sometimes in the shivering cold, these conditions are rarely met. Further, Police Officers rarely perform these test as they are trained. The results are stupid people tricks as opposed to field sobriety evaluations. Myth: Alcohol breath test machines are accurate. Fact: There are many sources of error in breath tests. Mouth alcohol, acetone, radio frequency interference, certain solvents and chemicals, mouth wash, asthma inhalers which contain albuterol suspended in ethanol or alcohol vapor. Even in the absence of any of these common problems and under ideal conditions, alcohol breath testers simply lack precision. The Georgia Intox. 5000 breath testing manual states that breath testing has inherent sample variability of 0.01 for one sample and 0.02 for two samples. This means that under ideal conditions, which is a highly unlikely situation, a breath alcohol reading of .08 reflects an actual blood alcohol reading of anywhere from .06 to .1. That is a margin of error of 25 percent of the legal limit. At the under 21 level of .02 the error rating is 100%! Myth: A person accused of DUI by breath test is presumed innocent. The presumption of innocence guaranteed by the both the U.S. and Georgia Constitutions. Fact: Although the presumption of innocence is guaranteed by law, it is denied in fact with a state administered breath test. The breath test is presumed accurate and you have to prove it doesn’t work by hiring an expert to debunk the test or having an extremely effective cross examination by an experienced DUI lawyer using the Officer's own training materials. Myth: Law enforcement officers can’t influence the BAC reading of a breath-testing machine. Fact: Law enforcement officers can and do influence BAC readings. The first part of lung air, after discarding the dead space, has an alcohol concentration much lower than the equivalent Blood Alcohol Content. Whereas, the last part of lung air has an alcohol concentration that is much higher than the equivalent Blood Alcohol Content. The last part of the breath can be over 50% above the alcohol level. Thus, a breath test reading of 0.14% taken from the last part of the breath may indicate that the blood level is only 0.09%." Thus, police often yell at drivers “Blow, Blow, Blow, Blow” much longer and deeper than is necessary for the machine to inflate the result. Myth: Alcohol breath testers measure the concentration of alcohol in a person’s blood stream (blood alcohol concentration or BAC). Fact: Alcohol breath machines don’t actually measure blood alcohol content, which can only be achieved with a blood test. They attempt to measure alcohol in the breath in order to estimate the concentration of alcohol in the blood. As a result not all states permit alcohol breath test. Alcohol breath machines detect any chemical compounds that contain the methyl group in its molecular structure. There are thousands of such compounds such as gasoline, glue, acetone, asthma inhalers, paint, paint remover, “new car smell,” celluloid, cleaning fluids, etc. Breath Machines also assume as constants certain ratios within the human body that actually vary widely from person to person and within the same person over time. For example, many breath-testing machines assume a 2,100-to-1 ratio in converting alcohol in the breath to estimates of alcohol in the blood. However, this ratio varies from 1,900 to 2,400 among people and also within a person over time. Some breath analysis machines assume a hematocrit (blood cells as a percent of blood volume) of 47%. By comparison, Lance Armstrong may have a hemocrit level of 47-49%, but anything over 50% is considering blood doping and would result in a two year ban from professional cycling llike the Tour de France or Tour de Georgia. However, hematocrit values range from 42 to 49% in men and from 37 to 47% in women. These machines appear to discriminate against female suspects. These machines assume a body mass of an average male and do not account for individuals with higher body fat. The machines assume an average body temperature. Can you say junk science? |
|
The Savannah Morning news reported that DUI arrest in Savannah, Chatham County have sharply increased so far this year compared to last year. This year there have been 127 DUI arrests since January 1st., 2010. Roadway fatalities have decreased from the same period last year from 7 to 3. Law enforcment officials attributed the decrease in fatalities to the creation of a DUI Task Force in Savannah as well as cooperation from the Georgia State Patrol Nighthawks Unit, another state wide DUI speciality unit. Savannah law enforcement will be performing multiple road blocks and increased police patrols in anticipation of the famous St. Patrick's Day partying.
|
|
|
The following is an estimate of Metro Atlanta DUI arrests in selected Metro Atlanta Counties for one week based on publicly available records. The information is only as accurate as the public records from which it is obtained.
|
Jurisdiction
|
DUIs
|
DUIs last week
|
Population
|
Arrest Per Population
|
Police Ranks
|
Percent Change
|
|
Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
66
|
52
|
out of 486,411 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0001357
|
5
|
26.92%
|
|
Gwinnett County DUI Arrests
|
82
|
94
|
out of 789499 (2008 U.S.Census Est.).
|
0.0001039
|
7
|
-12.77%
|
|
DeKalb County DUI Arrests(including Decatur, Clarkston, Dunwoody, Stone Mountain)
|
42
|
44
|
out of 739956 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000568
|
9
|
-4.55%
|
|
Fayette County DUI Arrests (including Fayetteville, Tyrone, Peachtree City)
|
12
|
13
|
out of 106465 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0001127
|
6
|
-7.69%
|
|
Henry County DUI Arrests(including Stockbridge, McDonough, Hampton and Locust Grove)
|
32
|
33
|
out of 191502 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.00016710
|
4
|
-3.03%
|
|
City of Doraville DUI Arrests(these include Sandy Springs, Johns Creek and Dunwoody DUI arrestees)
|
22
|
28
|
out of 9862 (2000 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0022308
|
1
|
-21.43%
|
|
Cobb County DUI Arrests(including Marietta, Kennesaw, Smyrna, Austell, Acworth)
|
0
|
56
|
out of 698158 (2008 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000000
|
10
|
-100.00%
|
|
City of Roswell DUI Arrsets
|
21
|
26
|
out of 87802 (2003 U.S. Census Est).
|
0.0002392
|
2
|
-19.23%
|
|
Clayton County DUI Arrests (including Forest Park, Lake City, Morrow, Riverdale)
|
46
|
44
|
out of 273718 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.000168056
|
3
|
4.55%
|
|
Total Metro Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
323
|
390
|
out of 3,383,373 (Combined Above-Listed U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000955
|
Total: Rank N/A
|
-17.18%
|
Percent under 1000 means a very low risk of DUI arrest per population. Percent over 2000 means DUI Hot Spot very risky to Drive after Drinking. If you would like your counties statistics shown please contact us with information on obtaining the public records. Years of tracking this data reveals that there is a almost a perfect correlation between cops on the street and DUI arrests. Jurisdictions with low DUI enforcement have low arrests and vice versa. Times of year when police take vacation or frequently have training, like August, arrests are down as well. By contrast, periods of high patrol concentration or enforcement, like the Christmas party season and new years eve, arrests are up.
|
|
|
The following is an estimate of Metro Atlanta DUI arrests in selected Metro Atlanta Counties for one week based on publicly available records. The information is only as accurate as the public records from which it is obtained.
|
Jurisdiction
|
DUIs
|
DUIs last week
|
Population
|
Arrest Per Population
|
Police Ranks
|
Percent Change
|
|
Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
52
|
47
|
out of 486,411 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0001069
|
8
|
10.64%
|
|
Gwinnett County DUI Arrests
|
94
|
72
|
out of 789499 (2008 U.S.Census Est.).
|
0.0001191
|
6
|
30.56%
|
|
DeKalb County DUI Arrests(including Decatur, Clarkston, Dunwoody, Stone Mountain)
|
44
|
40
|
out of 739956 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000595
|
10
|
10.00%
|
|
Fayette County DUI Arrests (including Fayetteville, Tyrone, Peachtree City)
|
13
|
9
|
out of 106465 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0001221
|
5
|
44.44%
|
|
Henry County DUI Arrests(including Stockbridge, McDonough, Hampton and Locust Grove)
|
33
|
34
|
out of 191502 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.00017232
|
3
|
-2.94%
|
|
City of Doraville DUI Arrests(these include Sandy Springs, Johns Creek and Dunwoody DUI arrestees)
|
28
|
18
|
out of 9862 (2000 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0028392
|
1
|
55.56%
|
|
Cobb County DUI Arrests(including Marietta, Kennesaw, Smyrna, Austell, Acworth)
|
56
|
43
|
out of 698158 (2008 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000802
|
9
|
30.23%
|
|
City of Roswell DUI Arrsets
|
26
|
16
|
out of 87802 (2003 U.S. Census Est).
|
0.0002961
|
2
|
62.50%
|
|
Clayton County DUI Arrests (including Forest Park, Lake City, Morrow, Riverdale)
|
46
|
44
|
out of 273718 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.000168056
|
4
|
4.55%
|
|
Total Metro Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
392
|
323
|
out of 3,383,373 (Combined Above-Listed U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0001159
|
Total: Rank N/A
|
21.36%
|
Percent under 1000 means a very low risk of DUI arrest per population. Percent over 2000 means DUI Hot Spot very risky to Drive after Drinking. If you would like your counties statistics shown please contact us with information on obtaining the public records. Years of tracking this data reveals that there is a almost a perfect correlation between cops on the street and DUI arrests. Jurisdictions with low DUI enforcement have low arrests and vice versa. Times of year when police take vacation or frequently have training, like August, arrests are down as well. By contrast, periods of high patrol concentration or enforcement, like the Christmas party season and new years eve, arrests are up.
|
|
|
The following is an estimate of Metro Atlanta DUI arrests in selected Metro Atlanta Counties for one week based on publicly available records. The information is only as accurate as the public records from which it is obtained.
|
Jurisdiction
|
DUIs
|
DUIs last week
|
Population
|
Arrest Per Population
|
Police Ranks
|
Percent Change
|
|
Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
47
|
36
|
out of 486,411 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000966
|
5
|
30.56%
|
|
Gwinnett County DUI Arrests
|
72
|
92
|
out of 789499 (2008 U.S.Census Est.).
|
0.0000912
|
7
|
-21.74%
|
|
DeKalb County DUI Arrests(including Decatur, Clarkston, Dunwoody, Stone Mountain)
|
40
|
45
|
out of 739956 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000541
|
10
|
-11.11%
|
|
Fayette County DUI Arrests (including Fayetteville, Tyrone, Peachtree City)
|
9
|
15
|
out of 106465 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000845
|
8
|
-40.00%
|
|
Henry County DUI Arrests(including Stockbridge, McDonough, Hampton and Locust Grove)
|
34
|
28
|
out of 191502 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.00017754
|
3
|
21.43%
|
|
City of Doraville DUI Arrests(these include Sandy Springs, Johns Creek and Dunwoody DUI arrestees)
|
18
|
0
|
out of 9862 (2000 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0018252
|
1
|
#DIV/0!
|
|
Cobb County DUI Arrests(including Marietta, Kennesaw, Smyrna, Austell, Acworth)
|
43
|
49
|
out of 698158 (2008 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000616
|
9
|
-12.24%
|
|
City of Roswell DUI Arrsets
|
16
|
18
|
out of 87802 (2003 U.S. Census Est).
|
0.0001822
|
2
|
-11.11%
|
|
Clayton County DUI Arrests (including Forest Park, Lake City, Morrow, Riverdale)
|
44
|
17
|
out of 273718 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.000160749
|
4
|
158.82%
|
|
Total Metro Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
323
|
300
|
out of 3,383,373 (Combined Above-Listed U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000955
|
Total: Rank N/A
|
7.67%
|
Percent under 1000 means a very low risk of DUI arrest per population. Percent over 2000 means DUI Hot Spot very risky to Drive after Drinking. If you would like your counties statistics shown please contact us with information on obtaining the public records. Years of tracking this data reveals that there is a almost a perfect correlation between cops on the street and DUI arrests. Jurisdictions with low DUI enforcement have low arrests and vice versa. Times of year when police take vacation or frequently have training, like August, arrests are down as well. By contrast, periods of high patrol concentration or enforcement, like the Christmas party season and new years eve, arrests are up.
|
|
|
The following is an estimate of Metro Atlanta DUI arrests in selected Metro Atlanta Counties for one week based on publicly available records. The information is only as accurate as the public records from which it is obtained.
|
Jurisdiction
|
DUIs
|
DUIs last week
|
Population
|
Arrest Per Population
|
Police Ranks
|
Percent Change
|
|
Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
36
|
39
|
out of 486,411 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000740
|
6
|
-7.69%
|
|
Gwinnett County DUI Arrests
|
92
|
63
|
out of 789499 (2008 U.S.Census Est.).
|
0.0001165
|
4
|
46.03%
|
|
DeKalb County DUI Arrests
|
45
|
33
|
out of 739956 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000608
|
9
|
36.36%
|
|
Fayette County DUI Arrests
|
15
|
6
|
out of 106465 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0001409
|
3
|
150.00%
|
|
Henry County DUI Arrests(including Stockbridge, McDonough, Hampton and Locust Grove)
|
28
|
34
|
out of 191502 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.00014621
|
2
|
-17.65%
|
|
City of Doraville DUI Arrests(these include Sandy Springs, Johns Creek and Dunwoody DUI arrestees)
|
0
|
17
|
out of 9862 (2000 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000000
|
10
|
-100.00%
|
|
Cobb County DUI Arrests
|
49
|
33
|
out of 698158 (2008 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000702
|
7
|
48.48%
|
|
City of Roswell DUI Arrests
|
18
|
7
|
out of 87802 (2003 U.S. Census Est).
|
0.0002050
|
1
|
157.14%
|
|
Clayton County DUI Arrests (including Forest Park, Lake City, Morrow, Riverdale)
|
17
|
37
|
out of 273718 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
6.21077E-05
|
7
|
-54.05%
|
|
Total Metro Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
300
|
269
|
out of 3,383,373 (Combined Above-Listed U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000887
|
Total: Rank N/A
|
11.52%
|
Percent under 1000 means a very low risk of DUI arrest per population. Percent over 2000 means DUI Hot Spot very risky to Drive after Drinking. If you would like your counties statistics shown please contact us with information on obtaining the public records. Years of tracking this data reveals that there is a almost a perfect correlation between cops on the street and DUI arrests. Jurisdictions with low DUI enforcement have low arrests and vice versa. Times of year when police take vacation or frequently have training, like August, arrests are down as well. By contrast, periods of high patrol concentration or enforcement, like the Christmas party season and new years eve, arrests are up.
|
|
|
The following is an estimate of Metro Atlanta DUI arrests in selected Metro Atlanta Counties for one week based on publicly available records. The information is only as accurate as the public records from which it is obtained.
|
Jurisdiction
|
DUIs
|
DUIs last week
|
Population
|
Arrest Per Population
|
Police Ranks
|
Percent Change
|
|
Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
39
|
44
|
out of 486,411 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000802
|
4
|
-11.36%
|
|
Gwinnett County DUI Arrests
|
63
|
79
|
out of 789499 (2008 U.S.Census Est.).
|
0.0000798
|
5
|
-20.25%
|
|
DeKalb County DUI Arrests
|
33
|
38
|
out of 739956 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000446
|
10
|
-13.16%
|
|
Fayette County DUI Arrests
|
6
|
9
|
out of 106465 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000564
|
8
|
-33.33%
|
|
Henry County DUI Arrests
|
34
|
32
|
out of 191502 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.00017754
|
2
|
6.25%
|
|
City of Doraville DUI Arrests(these include Sandy Springs, Johns Creek and Dunwoody DUI arrestees)
|
17
|
26
|
out of 9862 (2000 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0017238
|
1
|
-34.62%
|
|
Cobb County DUI Arrests
|
33
|
47
|
out of 698158 (2008 U.S. Census Est.)
|
0.0000473
|
9
|
-29.79%
|
|
City of Roswell DUI Arrsets
|
7
|
12
|
out of 87802 (2003 U.S. Census Est).
|
0.0000797
|
6
|
-41.67%
|
|
Clayton County DUI Arrests
|
37
|
41
|
out of 273718 (7/2006 U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.000135176
|
3
|
-9.76%
|
|
Total Metro Atlanta DUI Arrests
|
269
|
328
|
out of 3,383,373 (Combined Above-Listed U.S. Census Est.).
|
0.0000795
|
Total: Rank N/A
|
-17.99%
|
Percent under 1000 means a very low risk of DUI arrest per population. Percent over 2000 means DUI Hot Spot very risky to Drive after Drinking. If you would like your counties statistics shown please contact us with information on obtaining the public records. Years of tracking this data reveals that there is a almost a perfect correlation between cops on the street and DUI arrests. Jurisdictions with low DUI enforcement have low arrests and vice versa. Times of year when police take vacation or frequently have training, like August, arrests are down as well. By contrast, periods of high patrol concentration or enforcement, like the Christmas party season and new years eve, arrests are up.
|
|
Georgia Representative Kevin Levitas is banking more Georgia DUI capital at the State House in Atlanta with a new "tougher on DUI offenders" legislation in HB 92. Last year it was toughening sanctions for multiple DUI offenders. This year the target is first time DUI offenders. Soccer moms beware of that third glass of wine! It is well known that there is gender bias for DUI breath and blood testing based on female physiology. Women will test higher on DUI tests than a man based on the same amount of alcohol in their system just because of your gender. Impairment has nothing to do with a Georgia Breath test DUI as punishment is based on an arbitrary blood or breath alcohol DUI level. It is well known that alcohol effects different people differently. If you are arrested and convicted of a first offense DUI and register over 0.15 on a breath or blood test, then you will face punishment for a second in ten years DUI including ninety days in jail all of which maybe probated with the exception of a mandatory 72 hours, 30 days community service, mandatory drug and alochol evaluation, and a mandatory dui breath testing device installed on any vehicle you drive for six months. Georgia will be following the foot steps of Arizona and New Mexico and other states in this new more aggressive attack on social drinking and impaired and not just drunk driving. MADD is sponsoring a nationwide push for interlock breath testing devices on all first time DUI offenders. Installation can cost upward of $100.00 and monthly maintenance can be in the $80.00 range. It is now more important than ever if this legisltion is signed into law to refuse a blood or breath alcohol test. If you don't refuse, you will lose!
|
|
|
A man who was pulled over for suspicion of DUI in Covington, Georgia, Rockdale County did the turn and run test instead of the Walk and Turn test. He wasn't under arrest, so why can't a man run. He had an odor of alcohol, admitted to drinking a few beers, and had red and glassy eyes. The Covington Police asked the man to perform Standardized Field Sobriety Tests such as the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus or eye jerking test, the one leg stand and walk and turn. When the tests did not seem to be going his way, the man exclaimed "See ya" and began the 300 yard turn and run. Unfortunately, he slipped when hurdling a retaining wall and failed that test as well. He blew a .14 at the police station.
|
|
Washington Police have discovered that DUI breath tests on the Intoxilzyer 5000 have been flawed since 2008 and are dropping DUIs because of it. These are the same DUI breath test machines used in Georgia to incarcerate people for DUI arrests and DUIs in Atlanta. Unlike district authorities DUI law enforcement officials in Atlanta do not audit machines like they do in the nations capital. The machines were not properly calibrated. It was not caught until recently when the machines were audited. Despite repeated failures of the Intoxilyzer 5000, other states like Florida banning the machine and newer and more accurate Intoxilyzer 8000 on the market, Georgia authorities are not even looking at other devices. Georgia Appellate Courts have continued to limit Defense Attorney's ability to request information about the breath machine from the state or even subpoena evidence from the machine's manufacturer. Contributing to the "drive thru justice" mentality for DUI law enforcement. Don't believe me, click here to read the article.
|
|
What does it take for someone under 21 to be arrested for DUI? An odor of alcohol and an admission of drinking is enough regardless of impairment. In Dodds v. State, 288 Ga. App. 231 (2007), a 19 year old male was stopped by police as a result of his tag frame partially covering his license plate validation sticker. There was an odor of alcohol about the young man and he admitted to drinking two beers earlier. There was no evidence of less safe driving, unsteadiness, slurred speech, red and glassy eyes. Although the Georgia Court of Appeals held that he could not be arrested for less safe driving as a result of alcohol consumption or drunk driving, he could be arrested for driving with a blood or breath alcohol over 0.02 even without a valid breath test or even a field sobriety test indicating that his blood or breath alcohol was over 0.02. The admission of drinking and odor of alcohol was enough to arrest and take to jail. Talk about zero tolerance. What should you do if your are under 21 and driving with any alcohol on your breath? Give your identifying information, ask for an attorney and remain silent. Any breath sample or statements will land you in jail and without a breath sample the government has to prove you are a less safe driver which in most cases they can't do. You will lose your license regardless of what you do, so there is no incentive to cooperate.
|
|
|
If you have been arrested for DUI in Gwinnett County Georgia, one of the first things you should consider doing is to obtain your DUI police incident report. A DUI incident report may be obtained in person from any of the six Gwinnett County Police locations:
Gwinnett County Police Headquarters
770 Hi Hope Road
Lawrenceville, Ga 30044
West Precinct
6160 Crescent Drive
Norcross, GA 30071
South Precinct
2180 Stone Dr
Lilburn, Ga 30047
North Precinct
2735 Mall of Ga Blvd
Buford, Ga 30518
East Precinct
2273 Alcovy Rd.
Dacula, Ga 30019
Central Precinct
3125 Satellite Blvd
Duluth, Ga 30096.
There is a $0.25 per page copying charge for incident reports and a flat fee of $5 for accident reports. DUI incident reports maybe requested by mail by sending a request including the case number, your name, and $3 for incident Reports or $5 for accident reports (check or money order, payable to "Gwinnett County Police") with a self-addressed stamped envelope to: Gwinnett County Police Department, Attn: Records, PO Box 602, Lawrenceville GA 30046. The police stations are closed on Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday and are open other days from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. but are closed from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. for lunch
|
|
|
The United States Constitution,6th Amendment to the Bill of Rights states,
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."
The Georgia Constitution provides in Article1, Section1, paragraph XIV, titled, "Benefit of counsel; accusation; list of witnesses; compulsory process" as follows:
"Every person charged with an offense against the laws of this state shall have the privilege and benefit of counsel; shall be furnished with a copy of the accusation or indictment and, on demand, with a list of the witnesses on whose testimony such charge is founded; shall have compulsory process to obtain the testimony of that person's own witnesses; and shall be confronted with the witnesses testifying against such person."
The Georgia Constitution often provides more rights than our federal constitution and should never be overlooked.
In the news recently has been the issue of the right to confront witnesses. In the summer of 2009, in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. _____ , 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009),the United States Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts statute which allowed a crime lab analysts report identifying a drug to be admitted without person who rendered the analsys showing up for court. The court reversed, on confrontation clause grounds, a Massachusetts Supreme Court decision which had affirmed a cocaine conviction based on the tendering of the report of the crime lab analyst on the basis of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness. The Supreme Court in an opinion by Justice Anthony Scalia based his decision upon a plain reading of the 6th Amendment's confrontation clause.
The Melendez-Diaz decision reaffirmed the rule it had announced in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), that a witness's testimony against a defendant is inadmissible unless the witness appears at trial or, if the witness is unavailable, the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination when the witnesses testimony is testimonial in nature. In Crawford, playing a tape-recorded 911 call of a non-testifying witness was held to violate the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause.
Georgia practitioners are encouraged to object to both hearsay nature of such reports and the violation of rights guaranteed by the 6th Amendment. As Justice Scalia pointed out in Melendez-Diaz, a government entity whose sole purpose is to gather records at trial is incapacable of availing itself of a business records exception to the hearsay rule. In Walton v. State, 278 Ga. 432 (2004), the Georgia Supreme Court required express a confrontation clause objection to preserve issue for appeal. "In Georgia, 'hearsay testimony is not only inadmissible but wholly without probative value, and its introduction without objection does not give it any weight or force whatever in establishing a fact.'" Day v. State, 235 Ga.App. 771 (1998).
Georgia has its own "notice and demand" statute for crime lab reports wherein the prosecutor has the right to notice use of a crime lab affidavit at trial as opposed to a live witness and the defense attorney must file a demand for live witness testimony. See, OCGA 35-3-154.1. This was in response to Miller v. State, 266 Ga. 850 (1996) where the Georgia Supreme Court made it clear that where lab analysis is needed to prove a crime, a written report is insufficient. To prove the crime, the analyst must testify. In Miller, the Georgia Supreme Court invalidated a newly minted Georgia statute which allowed the state, under certain conditions, to admit an analyst's certificate identifying a drug wthout producing the analyst.
In Carolina .v State, A09A2053, decided January 13, 2010, the Georgia Court of Appeals decided the question of whether a crime lab scientist who actually runs the test must appear in court or only the scientist who interprets the results. The Court of Appeals ruled that under Georgia case precedent and Melendez-Diaz, ____U.S.___; 129 S.Ct. 2527; 174 LE2d 314(2009), that the defense does not have the constitutional right to cross-examine the lab technician who may have actually performed the tests but just the scientist who interpreted the results. Citing, Dunn v. State, 292 Ga. App. 667 (665 SE2d 377) (2008), ( cited as a "thoughtful and well reasoned opinion of the majority," id. at 673 (Phipps, J., concurring fully and specially); Reddick v. State, 298 Ga. App. 155, 157-158 (2) (679 SE2d 380) (2009); Carter v. State, 297 Ga. App. 608, 610-611 (2) (677 SE2d 792) (2009); see also Rector v. State 285 Ga. 714, 715 (4) (681 SE2d 157) (2009) (trial court did not err by allowing the State's toxicologist to testify about a toxicology report prepared by another doctor where toxicologist reviewed the report and reached the same conclusion as the doctor who prepared the report).
On January 25, 2010, in Briscoe v. Virginia, 559 U.S. ______, 2010 U.S. Lexis 767, in a one-sentence per curiam opinion, the United States Supreme Court vacated a Virginia Supreme Court opinion, Briscoe v. State, 275 Va. 283 (2008), which had affirmed a cocaine conviction using a similar certificate under a similar state law presenting the question of whether the right to confrontation would be satisfied by providing that the accused has a right to call the crime lab analyst who prepared the crime lab report as his own witness. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case "for further proceedings not inconsistent with Melendez-Diaz" answering the question with a resounding "No." Thus, averting a age were criminal defendants could be tried on affidavits and have the onus bringing states witnesses to court to prove their innocence.
The real question becomes where does DUI breath testing fit in in this brave new world of plain reading of constitutional rights? The secret source code is still out there so only time will tell.
|
|
|
Henry County Police Department in McDonough, GA: Incident & Accident Reports
The Henry County Police Department Records Unit is located inside the Police Headquarters at
108 South Zack Hinton Parkway
McDonough, GA 30253
The Records Department is open Monday - Friday from 8:00AM until 5:00PM. An Incident Report or Accident Report may be obtained in person from the Records Unit for $5.00. Please allow 3 business days (or 72 hours) from the date the report was filed before a request for a copy of the report is made. The telephone number for the Henry County Police Department is 770 288-8200.
Police Department Building
|
|
|
The law of diminishing returns is a fundamental principle of economics which is defined as:
- The tendency for a continuing effort toward a particular goal to decline in effectiveness after a certain amount of success has been achieved.
- (economics) A relationship between input and output, such that adding units of any one input (labour, capital etc.) to fixed amounts of the others will yield successively smaller increments of output.
An example would be security. Assume you live in a neighborhood with one hundred houses, three burglars, no police, and assume a burglar can only burgle one house a night. With no police, you could assume 3 burglaries a night. If you add one police officer who can protect 33 houses a night, you would assume the next night you would still have 3 burglaries since 67 houses are left unprotected. If you add 2 police officers, you would still have 3 burglaries because 2 police can only protect 66 houses leaving 33 houses unprotected. The rate is flat. If you add three police, then 99 houses are protected and suddenly there is only one burglary. If you add 4 police then 132 houses can be protected, so there are no burglaries. After 3.03 police have been hired, you have reached the point of diminishing returns. If you add 5 police you are wasting your money, since 165 houses can be protected and there are only 100 houses.
Now think about the DUI laws. The Goal of DUI laws is to prevent DUI deaths and injuries. In the 1970's, the legal limit for DUI was .12 or the level in which most people are considered drunk. The crime was commonly known as drunk driving. In the 1980's, the legal limit was reduced to 0.10 until about 2000. In 2000, the legal limit was reduced to 0.08 by then President Bill Clinton in a zero tolerance for DUI bill that tied 0.08 to federal highway funds as was done with the drinking age being raised from 18 to 21 in the mid-1980s. DUI deaths dropped from the 1980s steadily until about 2000. In 2000, the DUI fatality rates began to climb back to levels not seen since the early 1990s.
Why? The vast majority of DUI fatalities occur at 0.15 or higher. So why does lowering the legal limit to 0.08 not reduce DUI fatalities. Its simple economics. The law of diminishing returns. You see most people are not noticeably impaired by alcohol at 0.08. In fact, many people can past field sobriety tests like standing on one foot for 30 seconds up to as high as 0.15. If you can stand on one foot for 30 seconds, who exactly are you endangering? Police Officers now arrest people for DUI who register over 0.08 or greater. In some jurisdictions, drivers are arrested if they blow over .05 but under .08 and charged as less safe drivers. Assuming the only factor that has changed is the legal limit, the reason for the increase of fatalities is that the vast majority of people arrested for DUI are between 0.08 to 0.15. It takes an officer an average of 2 hours to arrest someone for DUI. Field sobriety tests have to be performed, the person searched, handcuffed, the car impounded, and the person transported to jail. Most police forces are straining to keep police on the street so taking an officer off the road for two hours is a huge blow to manpower. Most DUI task forces in Georgia are less than 10 officers. What happens is while the DUI police officer is fooling around with some who blows 0.08 who isn't even impaired about 10 or 15 people who are really drunk are driving by. The answer is either to raise the legal limit or to simply ticket people who blow between 0.08 and 0.15, take their license and tow their car. This would get the alleged impaired driver off the road and would cut in half the time an officer spends on people who are not drunk so they can focus on the real drunk drivers and thereby reduce DUI fatalities once again. The Cato institute came to the same conclusion in a study it performed. The mission of the Cato Institute is to increase the understanding of public policies based on the principles of limited government, free markets, individual liberty, and peace. The Institute will use the most effective means to originate, advocate, promote, and disseminate applicable policy proposals that create free, open, and civil societies in the United States and throughout the world.
To read the article from the Cato Institute click the title below:
Radley Balko is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute. Added to cato.org on October 30, 2005 The article appeared in the Washington Times on October 30, 2005.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
January 21, 2010: National Public Radio story reveals that overburdened local governments spend over $9 Billion (with a B) Dollars housing people who have been arrested, are awating trial, and can't afford to post bail some as low as fifty dollars. These are people a judge has determined are not dangerous, not a threat to society, not likely to intimidate witnesses, and not likely to run. They have not been found guilty. They simply have no money and are awaiting trial. Some plead guilty to crimes they have not committed just to get out of jail as waiting for a trial could take months or even years. In order to post bond, many people have to pay professional bail bondsmen a non-refundable percentage, usually between 10-15% of the bail to have the bail bondsmen pledge to pay the bail amount if the Defendant does not appear in court. In some counties, tax payers pay a quarter of every tax dollar housing these pre-trial arrestees. A law enforcement industrial complex has grown up around the practice producing large profits for bail bonding firms. With these large profits, political lobbyist have followed close behind under the rallying cry "tough on crime" pressuring politicians, judges and sheriffs to set high bonds and fighting pre-trial release programs which save taxpayers millions and bail bonding firms see as stealing their business. In one particular case, a county has spent over $7,000.00 housing a man awaiting trial for stealing blankets to stay warm and if he plead guilty he would likely only receive a probation sentence. To read the story click here.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE WARNING!!!!
PILOT WARNING!!!!
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION WARNING!!!!
DeKalb DUI Lawyer Recent DUI success stories: The only unwinnable DUI is the untried DUI! Stay tuned for more victories. The wins just keep on coming! Past success does not guarantee future results only a dedication to winning your DUI, hard work and our clients.
1) DUI DeKalb County, I-20, August 26, 2009: Alleged DUI Driver changed lanes without a blinker on I-20 in DeKalb County just south of Decatur, Georgia on April 15, 2009. The other vehicle was in the alleged DUI Driver's blind-spot and probably passing in the right lane. A Georgia State Patrol Officer in the speciality DUI unit called the Nighthawks who had just left a Mother's Against Drunk Driving meeting observed the alleged illegal lane change and stopped the driver on the side of I-20. Further, the trooper admited that his units DUI arrests were down in 2009 from 2008 and there had been discussions about how to increase DUI arrests. Traffic was heavy, it was windy, and the traffic noise was very loud. The trooper approached the vehicle and claimed the driver had slurred speech but the video show otherwise. The driver exited his vehicle properly, walked to the rear of his vehicle properly, produced his license without trouble and did not visibly sway while speaking to the officer on video, although the trooper claimed that the alleged DUI driver swayed. Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test (HGN) or eye jerking test was performed. An effective DUI lawyer cross-examination and the video clearly evidenced that the HGN was not performed according to the trooper's training and even if it had been, the HGN was only 77% accurate. The walk and turn and one leg stand were performed poorly but the state could not prove that the unreasonable conditions on the side of I-20 were to blame as opposed to alcohol. The alleged driver tested positive for alcohol consumption on the handheld breath test. The Driver refused to take a state adminstered test of his breath under the implied consent law. After reviewing the video, the Jury came back NOT GUILTY ON THE DUI and guilty on the failure to maintain lane. The Defendant paid a $200.00 fine.
2) DUI DeKalb County, Georgia: February 20, 2008. Client involved in single car accident after falling asleep. Client had been performing charity work with his Bank/Employer earlier in the day and finished the morning work with a sunday brunch that included 1-2 Mimosa's or champange and orange juice. Later that evening while driving home, Defendant fell asleep at wheel and ran off the road. Client had been working long hours and had an eye infection. Medics arrived and began treating his injuries including shoulder and chest pain and bruising. Police arrived and pull client out of ambulance. Gave field evaluations including eye test, one leg stand and walk and turn. Eye test was thrown out as improperly performed. Client passed one leg stand but allegedly failed walk and turn, although it was poorly instructed. Client testified. Jury found client NOT GUILTY on DUI in 20 minutes.
October 2008: three DUI reduced to Reckless; one DUI reduced to Disorderly Conduct; felony theft dismissed; felony Habitual Violator reduced to misdemeanor; one DUI dismissed.
August 2008: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving; one DUI dismissed with prejudice at Jury Trial.
July 2008: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving; carrying a concealed weapon reduced to disorderly conduct.
June 2008: five DUI charges reduced to reckless driving.
May 2008: one DUI charge reduced to reckless driving.
April 2008: one DUI dismissed at Jury Trial; one DUI reduced reckless driving; one drug possession dismissed on an illegal search; Aggravated Assault reduced to Reckless Conduct
March 2008: two DUI charges reduced to reckless driving. One public intoxication dismissed.
February 2008: seven DUI charges reduced to reckless driving.
January 2008: five DUI charges reduced to reckless driving. One drinking and driving charge dismissed.
December 2007: seven DUI charges reduced to reckless driving.
November 2007: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving.
November 2007: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving.
September 2007: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving. One DUI dismissed after a motion to suppress. one DUI reduced to failure to exercise due care. A Felony Criminal Damage reduced to Misd. Criminal Trespass
August 2007: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving. Three DUI charges dismissed. Marijuana Possession reduced to disorderly conduct.
July 2007: four DUI charges reduced to reckless driving. One Driving on a Suspended License to no License on person
June 2007: two DUI charges dismissed: One for failure to prosecute at jury trial and one dismissed for lack of probable cause to arrest; one traffic case dismissed for failure to prosecute; one DUI reduced to reckless driving.
May 2007: one DUI reduced to Failure to Exercise Due Care; one DUI dismissed for failure to prosecute; two Possession Marijuana with intent to distribute reduced.April 2007: three DUI charges reduced to Reckless Driving without hearing. One DUI dismissed by prosecutor at hearing based on illegal stop.
March 2007: four DUI charges reduced to Reckless Driving without hearing.
February 2007: two DUI charges reduced to Reckless Driving without hearing. Two Clients offered Pretrial Intervention (dismissal) without hearing.
January 2007: three DUI charges reduced to Reckless Driving without hearing. One Clients offered Pretrial Intervention (dismissal) without hearing.
December 2006: seven DUI charges reduced to Reckless Driving without trial. one suspended license dismissed just by filing a motion to suppress with no hearing!
November 2006: four DUI charges reduced to Reckless without trial; one DUI case DISMISSED without a hearing. one DUI charges offered Pretrial Intervention or dismissal with DUI/alcohol classes.
October 2006: ten DUIs reduced to Reckless Driving without trial; two cases DISMISSED without a hearing.
|
|
 |
|
|