Georgia DUI Cases of Note


It is about time to end race discrimination in Jury Selection

Wednesday, November 04, 2015
racial profiling in jury selection

 On November 2, 2015, the New York Times reported on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court case of Foster vs. Chatman, Case No. 14-8349. This is a Georgia Death penalty case where an all white jury convicted Foster of capital murder and the death penalty.  After the normal appeals were exhausted, an open record request was sent for the prosecutors notes during jury selection in conjunction with a Habeas Corpus investigation. The Open Records request revealed that  the prosecutor had marked African-American jurors in his notes during jury selection as B1, B2 et cetera. The prosecutor had also prioritized the African American jurors in case they had to let a black person on the jury. The prosecutor also highlighted all the black jurors with green highlighter markers. 

This case occurred just four months after Batson v. Kentucky where the U.S. Supreme Court held that jurors may not be stricken based on race. The State tried to argue that the prosecutor marked jurors with the letter B and used a green highlighter specifically because of the concerns raised in Batson, supra. But as Justice Breyer pointed out, isn't it a little surprising that this issue was never raised by the State prior the main briefs in the U.S. Supreme Court when there was a smoking gun found in the prosecutors notes almost 30 years later. 

Under Batson, there is a three step process to determine whether a prosecutor has used peremptory challenges to strike jurors on the basis of race: (1) the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race; (2) if this showing is made, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to articulate a clear and reasonably specific race-neutral explanation for striking the jurors in question and (3) the trial court must evaluate the credibility of the proffered reasons and determine whether the defendant has carried his burden of proving purposeful discrimination. 476 U.S. 79 at 96-98. On appellate review, a trial court's denial of a Batson challenge will not be reversed unless clearly erroneous. Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 369 (1991) 

The reality of a Batson challenge is that even after you make a prima facie case of race based jury strikes, all the prosecutor has to do is articulate race neutral reasons for the peremptory jury strikes.  This generally not difficult.  You should not be able to  give canned responses like "personal preference'" or "low income" which have been approved by some courts as race neutral.  You just have to generally articulate a race neutral reason.  However, In Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court said that the failure to engage in  any meaningful voir dire about whatever your reason is, is evidence suggesting that the explanation is a sham  and a pretext. This is a trap that catches many prosecutors.  This is because, the Batson challenge is made after the jury is selected. So prosecutors are generally shooting from the hip and throwing as many reasons as they can hoping that at least one will stick.

One of the black jurors, Ms. Garrett, was stricken because she was a social worker and because her son had a drug conviction. In reality, she was not a social worker, and the prosecutor did not find out until after the trial that her son had a drug conviction which could not have been a reason.  One of the black jurors was dismissed because she was close in age at 34 to a 19 year old.  Justice Alito pointed out that this was not close in age.  

In this day and age, it is just not okay to dismiss a jury based on race or even to dismiss all the jurors of one race. Juries should reflect the community. The proportion of race and gender should basically reflect the most recent census in the community in the jurors called to jury duty generally and the jurors sent to a given court room. A prosecutor should not be able to exercise a discretionary or peremptory strike if that strike crossed the quota imposed by the most recent census.  The justice system to maintain any sense of integrity and moral authority must avoid even the appearance of impropriety.  Striking all the jurors of one race smacks of institutional racism. 

-Author: George Creal




    No legal advice should be obtained from the web site alone. George C. Creal, Jr., P.C. is Georgia Professional Corporation authorized to practice law in the State of Georgia only and all information contained in this web site is intended for use for DUI/DWIs occurring in the State of Georgia. Individuals with DUI/DWIs from outside the State of Georgia should contact a licensed attorney in the state of occurrence of their DUI. Copyright © 2015 George C. Creal, Jr. P.C.
    Protected by Copyscape Online Plagiarism Checker
    George C. Creal Jr.
    on Google+

    Atlanta Office: 480 John Wesley Dobbs Ave., NE, Unit 190, Atlanta, GA 30312 Phone: (404) 333-0706